« Notes From The Countryside: Conditional Call Forwarding Tricks | Main | 95% LTE Coverage on a Test Drive Across Germany »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c34f69e2016769403e40970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sticking to a Weak Wi-Fi:

Comments

Gabeuk

Annoying isn't it. These boundary conditions are outright hostile to the average user.

A mix of the WiFi Alliance's Passpoint and 3GPP's ANDSF should help in the medium to longer term.

Shorter term, Apple's new WiFi Plus Cellular in the iOS6 beta looks useful.

For Android it appears some equivalent form of connectivity manager would need to be developed by each OEM, as thus far it doesn't seem to be forthcoming from Google

Sergey

The situation with 2 or more Wi-Fi access points is similar to 2 or more BTSs without neighbor relations. In this case the MS will stick to the serving BTS until the call is dropped, because of coverage for instance. To perform a handover a controller that analyses measurements and neighbor relationships is needed.
I’ve heard of Wi-Fi controllers that do the aforementioned and make the handoffs between APs possible, but I’ve never encountered them in my life and have no such experience. I also don’t know whether those controllers can only automatically change an access point (like idle mode in GSM) or they can perform a handover (downloading a file while moving from one AP to another). There is a mention on the internet about 802.11r (roaming) which is an amendment to the 802.11 that is aimed to make outage of a connection less than 50 msec, so that VoWiFi calls are possible while moving. However, this feature seems to be present on enterprise APs, which are usually quite expensive and are used with a controller. Wi-Fi controllers are quite expensive and will set you back in the region of 500$ or more http://www.itworld.com/answers/topic/mobile-wireless/question/what-wi-fi-controller-and-do-i-need-one. The article also mentions the “software controller”, and if anybody has some practical experience with this stuff or with enterprise hardware controllers, it would be fascinating to hear - the topic itself is very interesting.
Until those controllers are cheap, you have to “be a controller” and switch from one AP to another manually. It’s not the worst idea, considering the pretty affordable price of your own Wi-Fi-BTS. Wi-Fi controllers aren’t cheap, but GSM or UMTS networks that can perform handovers aren’t cheap as well.
On the other hand, if you have several know SSIDs that you have already registered to and you can switch between them manually, why this “switching” can’t be done automatically? Some kind of software or OS facility could compare the received level from the known SSIDs and based on some algorithm could switch between them, at least in “idle mode”.

Sergey

Speaking of weak Wi-Fi, I’ve come across this website http://www.freeantennas.com/projects/template2/index.html that offers a pretty interesting and easy way to boost the coverage of a Wi-Fi access point. I’ve tried it myself with an A4 sheet and a piece of foil from a chocolate bar. The result was 9 dB boost in the direction of the main lobe and -12 dB in the direction of the opposite side lobe. A very nice way to increase Wi-Fi coverage, considering easiness and cheapness of such solution. And don’t forget about a bonus – a chocolate bar that comes wrapped into the antenna reflector.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

The Books to this Blog

Prepaid Wireless Wiki

My Pictures on Flickr

  • www.flickr.com
    martin.sauter's photos More of martin.sauter's photos

Android Cell Logger App

Misc

  • Clicky
    Clicky Web Analytics