« How Fast Mobile Web Browsing Has Become | Main | 500 Simultaneous Voice Calls Over My DSL Line - In Theory »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c34f69e2017d3bfcedbb970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Best and Worst Network Not Dependent on Number of Cells in Cities:

Comments

Andy

Great study! Thanks for this Martin!

But I didn't understand- why would only site location be the most important cause of best vs. worst performer? Why not capacity- number of carriers, air if, Iub especially- and other end to end aspects of network design?

mobilesociety

Hi Andy,

yes, all of that is obviously very important as well. But without having site first you cant do those. And getting a site up and running in the first place takes longest and must be one of the most expensive things. So I assumed they would have fewer ones.

Cheers,
Martin

Johannes

I have got one question: Your measurements show that all networks "have pretty much the same number of cells". Are you distinguishing gsm and umts cells? Is it important to make that difference with regard to what you are looking at? Or doesn't it matter at all?

Thanks,
Johannes

P.S. Thank you for this interesting blog. I read it frequently since I discovered it a few weeks ago.

mobilesociety

Hello Johannes,

Good point! 95% of the cells monitored were UMTS cells, only in one or two places along my drive test path did the mobile drop to GSM (for all 4 network operators)

Kind regards,
Martin

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

The Books to this Blog

Prepaid Wireless Wiki

My Pictures on Flickr

  • www.flickr.com
    martin.sauter's photos More of martin.sauter's photos

Android Cell Logger App

Misc

  • Clicky
    Clicky Web Analytics